| Volume 6, Issue
1 |
17-23 March 2003 |
CHECHNYA
Like normal, says Russia, as Chechnya
burns
Moscow has blocked all attempts to monitor
the human rights situation, even as the violations
continue
HOSTILITIES
in the Russian-occupied Republic of Chechnya constitute
one of the lingering violent conflicts in Europe today,
and humanitarian law violations on both sides are
commonplace. The Russian government has done little to
curb the torture, forced disappearances, killings of
non-combatants and other abuses commonly carried out by
its troops or to bring those responsible to justice. It
has also actively sought to return people displaced by
the conflict into the war zone.
Meanwhile,
two incidents in late 2002 have re-ignited the armed
conflict and the frequency of human rights violations.
The first occurred in October 2002 when approximately 50
Chechens attempted to coerce the Russian Government by
holding hundreds of civilians hostage in a Moscow
theatre. This resulted in the deaths of 129 citizens,
mostly due to the effects of a gas that Russian special
forces used in their rescue operation. The second
occurred in late December 2002 when Chechen forces blew
up the main government building in Grozny, killing at
least 72 civilians and wounding 210 others. These
attacks on civilians violate basic principles of
humanitarian law.
Concerns
over the future of the Chechnyan conflict were
heightened at the beginning of this month when the
Council of Europe's negotiator, Lord Judd, resigned in
protest at Moscow's insistence on holding a referendum
on a new constitution on 23 March 2003. Lord Judd argued
that a proper referendum could not be held under the
current dangerous conditions inside Chechnya.
Moscow,
anxious to portray improvements in the life inside the
war-torn republic, considers a referendum on a
constitution to be the first step towards installing
their own choice of government in the republic. Problems
were compounded when Lord Judd's most vocal Russian
opponent, Dmitri Rogozin, also resigned and called for
the group's dissolution. This is another blow for the
international community's involvement in Chechnya.
The
situation had worsened after negotiations between the
Russian Government and the Organisation for Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) regarding an extension of
the OSCE's mandate collapsed. This was due to Russia's
insistence that the mission end its human rights
monitoring and human rights mediation activities.
Since
mid-2001, the six-person mission of the OSCE had been
charged with promoting respect for human rights,
facilitating humanitarian aid, and promoting a peaceful
resolution of the crisis in Chechnya. It was the only
international monitor with an independent mandate to
report on the serious abuses that are a daily occurrence
in the region.
Russia
has also stopped key United Nations human rights
monitors from visiting Chechnya. Recently it has not
granted requests made by the Special Rapporteur on
Torture and the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial,
arbitrary and summary executions to visit the region.
The
OSCE monitors were an important safeguard against abuses
- a safeguard which is needed now more than ever. As
part of the Russian Government's attempts to portray the
situation as on the road to being normal, it has
aggressively promoted its programme to convince
internally displaced people to return to their homes
inside Chechnya.
The
tent camps in the neighbouring province of Ingushetia
are counter evidence of Russian claims that the war has
ceased. In sub-freezing temperatures, officials have
used a combination of threats and incentives to force
23,000 people residing in seven tent camps back into an
active war zone.
Despite
claims from Russian officials to the contrary, it is
clear (from the research of Human Rights Watch) that
migration officials have constantly harassed displaced
persons. People have been coerced into leaving their
tents by threats of arrest on false charges, withdrawal
of food allowances, cutting of gas and electricity
supplies during winter months and at times by physical
force.
Moreover,
for more than three years extrajudicial executions,
arbitrary detentions, forced disappearances, looting,
and the rape and torture of non-combatants by federal
Russian soldiers in Chechnya have been a regular
occurrence. There is no evidence that officials are
seriously investigating or attempting to stop such
crimes. These are violations of Russia's obligations
under Article 3 Common to the four Geneva Conventions of
1949.
Simply
being a male of fighting age appears sufficient grounds
for detention, and those detained are invariably beaten
and abused while family members are denied details of
their whereabouts.
Often
Russian forces commit abuses during zachistiki, or sweep
operations, which involve closing off streets, and in
some cases entire villages, for house-to house searches.
Increasingly, Russian forces appear to be carrying out
more targeted night operations, in which masked troops
raid particular homes and execute targeted individuals.
The November killing of Malika Umazheva, a former civil
servant who spoke out fiercely against human rights
abuses, was one of the clearest cases to date in which
Russian forces committed an extrajudicial execution for
retribution.
There
has also been an increase in the numbers of forced
disappearances. Relatives' inquiries as to the
whereabouts of their detained family members are
frequently met with denials that the
"disappeared" persons were ever in custody.
As
these detentions are unacknowledged, it places many
civilians outside the protection of the law and makes
them vulnerable to extrajudicial execution and torture.
On several occasions mass graves containing the bodies
of detained Chechnyans who had "disappeared"
in Russian custody have been discovered in Chechnya.
Such
abuses are, for the most part, committed with impunity
and there is no meaningful accountability process or
serious attempt by the Russian authorities to hold human
rights violators accountable. Although the Chechnya
procuracy has opened hundreds of investigations into
allegations of abuse, investigators have failed to take
basic steps to secure evidence and only a handful of
cases have reached the courts.
The
high profile case of Colonel Yuri Budanov at the end of
December 2002 was a clear demonstration of Russia's
resolve to shield its military from accountability.
Colonel Budanov was acquitted for the murder of a young
Chechen woman on the grounds of "temporary
insanity," by a military court and sent to a
psychiatric institution for treatment. This despite a
psychiatric assessment conducted immediately after his
arrest which found that he was sane at the time of the
murder. A charge of rape was also dropped without
explanation - despite a medical examination of the
victim which determined that she had indeed been raped.
In
January 2002 the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council
of Europe (PACE) requested that the Russian Government
submit a detailed list of investigations into crimes
committed during the Chechnya conflict. It was clear
from the submitted list that the vast majority of cases
investigating serious abuses had been suspended as a
matter of routine after two months (the minimum time
period for a criminal investigation required by law).
The
media reports an average of 25 Russian soldiers killed
each week, despite the Russian government's insistence
that the conflict is winding down. These deaths result
primarily from ambushes, bombings and mine explosions by
Chechen forces rather than from classic military
engagement. In situations of armed conflict, abuses such
as attacks on civilians, extrajudicial executions, rape,
torture and destruction of civilian property are all
violations of the Geneva Convention.
Worryingly,
in recent months Chechen rebel forces have pursued an
assassination campaign with renewed vigour. Targets
include civil servants, policemen and religious
clergymen cooperating with the Russian authorities. The
December 2002 killing of Mukhadin Musalov, the head of
the pro-Moscow Sharoi district administration by an
unidentified masked gunman while he was working in his
yard is but one of many examples.
Rebel
forces are believed to have been responsible for seven
assassination attempts and nine abductions of civil
servants since November 2002. Chechen rebel leader Aslan
Maskhadov has only half-heartedly condemned these
actions and has implied that abuses by Russian troops
excuse such crimes.
This
ingrained system of arbitrariness and impunity must be
confronted if there are to be lasting improvements in
the human rights situation in Chechnya.
One
method of ensuring greater accountability would be to
establish an independent national commission of enquiry
that would ensure the effective investigation and
prosecution of those responsible for violations of
international human rights and humanitarian law. The UN
Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from
Enforced Disappearances must also be fully enforced.
Concerned parties must pay particular attention to
Article 10, which requires that detainees be kept in
officially recognised places of detention, that
officials maintain accurate information on detainees and
their places of detention, and that family members are
promptly informed of their whereabouts.
There
is also an urgent need for the redeployment of the OSCE
assistance group in the region and for access to be
granted to the region for key UN thematic personnel.
Overall,
the region needs to be subject to far greater scrutiny
and international standards must be more strictly
enforced. This is the only way to address human rights
infringements that are currently a part of life in
Chechnya.
|